THE Berean
Bible Ministry

Introduction to Isaiah

Introduction to the Book of Isaiah

First, let’s take a look at the historical background leading up to the time of Isaiah. As you might recall, many years earlier God approached Abram with the deal of a lifetime. This is the Abrahamic Covenant, an unconditional contract between God, Abram and his descendants. It includes the promise of land (Gen. 12:1: 15:18-21), children and that through him, all the world would be blessed by the coming of the Messiah.

Gen. 12:1-3, “Leave your country . . . and go to the land I will show you. I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all the peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” Verse 7, “To your offspring I will give this land.”

First: He would give him a piece of land. Not just a few acres to graze animals or to grow vegetables, but a piece of land that would be able to house a whole nation. And this land would continue to be owned by his descendants. This land is modern-day Israel and is referred to as the Promised Land. The title deed to the land was given to Abraham and his descendants without any conditions.

Second: He would give him descendants as numerous as the “dust of the earth” (Gen. 15:16).   

Third: Not only that, but among your many descendants there will be a special person who will be known as the Messiah.”
 
Now we move forward to the time of Moses and the Israelites at Mt. Sinai. In Exodus 19 Moses came down from Mt. Sinai and explained to the Israelites the terms of another covenant, the Mosaic Covenant. Unlike the Abrahamic Covenant, which was unconditional, the Mosaic Covenant promised blessings only if the Israelites obeyed God.

After wandering in the desert for forty years and before the second generation of Israelites entered the promised land Moses gave them a review of the Law of Moses in the Book of Deuteronomy. Keep in mind that this generation never experienced the pagan worship that their parents saw in Egypt. Imagine if you grew up in a sheltered Christian community, attended Christian schools, were very active in your church and pretty much untouched by the world around you. Then, you are about to be sent off to a secular university. You might need a quick course in religion to prepare yourself for what you are about to experience.

Along with the threat that God would evict them from their land temporarily if their disobedience persisted (Deut. 28:36). And any future kings would have to abide by certain rules. In Deut. 17:16-20 we find that a king wasn’t to acquire a great number of horses (maintaining a large standing army), take on many wives (foreign wives would lead to the worship of pagan gods), or accumulate large amounts of silver and gold (imposing high taxes which would lead to the division of the kingdom). He was also required to write out the Law of Moses and read it throughout his life. The King was to be a student of this covenant so that he doesn’t stray from it.

As for the people themselves, they were to recite twice a day a statement of faith, call the Shema, to remind them not to worship other gods. This is found in Deut. 6:4 it says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one (the only one). Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. Verse 7, “Impress them on your children . . . Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.” The responsibility is the parents. They can delegate to others the authority to teach their children, but they can’t delegate the responsibility. And parents can’t assume that if they send their children to a Bible study, that they are getting properly trained.

To “love the Lord” was understood to mean to “be loyal to.” In other words, never worship other gods. And these teachings were to be passed down through the generations.

Moses presented this contract or covenant to the Israelites. How did they respond to this offer? Ex. 19:7, “So Moses went back and summoned the elders of the people and set forth before them all the words the Lord had commanded him to speak. “We will do everything the Lord has said.”

After Moses died, Joshua warned the Israelites, (Josh. 23:16), “If you violate the covenant of the Lord your God. . . you will quickly perish from the good las he has given you.” The privilege to live in the promised land was conditioned on their obedience to the Law of Moses. Their ownership was never to be revoked since that was part of the unconditional promise made by God to Abraham. Joshua then challenged the Israelites to make a commitment (Josh 24:15), “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your forefathers served beyond the river of the god of the Amorites in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.”

Joshua led the Israelites into the Promised Land, and they were governed by a series of judges. Then the people demanded that they be led by a king, like other nations had (1 Sam. 8:6-7).

Saul, David and Solomon were the three kings of Israel before the nations split into two countries, Israel in the north and Judah in the south.

Well, how did the Israelites do? How well did they abide by the covenant that they made at Mt. Sinai? As you recall from reading Judges, Kings and Chronicles, Israel didn’t always live in obedience to the Law of Moses.

In time God would raise up the Assyrian empire which would threaten Israel and Syria. These two kingdoms tried to persuade King Ahaz of Judah to join them in their effort to push back on Assyria. When Ahaz refused to join them, they (Syria and Israel) invaded Judah, forcing Ahaz (King of Judah) to join their alliance against Assyria. As this alliance made their way south towards Jerusalem, Isaiah assured King Ahaz that the alliance would fail to take Jerusalem. Ahaz refused to trust the advice Isaiah gave him and he sought the help of Assyria to fight against Syria and Israel.

2 Chron. 28:22-23, “In his time of trouble King Ahaz (a contemporary of Isaiah) became even more unfaithful to the Lord. He offered sacrifices to the gods of Damascus, who had defeated him; for he thought, “Since the gods of the kings of Aram have helped them, I will sacrifice to them so they will help me.” But they were his downfall and the downfall of all Israel.”

The Assyrians invaded and took Israel captive and were now the dominant power in the area imposing a heavy tribute on Judah.

Hezekiah became the king of Judah after Ahaz and tried to reform the corrupt religious practices. He fortified Jerusalem’s defenses, sought assistance from Egypt and refused to pay tribute to Assyria. This led the Assyrians to make a failed attack on Jerusalem in 701. B.C. Then there is a gap in time between Isa. Chapters 39 and 40 where we see Assyria conquered by the Babylonians who would attack Jerusalem in 587 B.C. and take many in captivity for 70 years. In 539 B.C. King Cyrus would lead the Persians to defeat Babylon and he would allow the Jews to return to Jerusalem where they rebuilt the temple during the time of Ezra and Nehemiah. Years later the Romans would take charge, and they would destroy the second temple.

The political situation in the middle east during the time of Isaiah seems as complicated as the one we see today.

During these difficult times was when Isaiah appeared on the scene. The first verse of the Book of Isaiah states that Isaiah prophesied during the reigns of four kings:

Uzziah (or Azariah) reigned for 52 years from about 788-736 B.C. Isaiah was called to ministry towards the end of Uzziah’s reign in 740 B.C.

Jotham reigned for 16 years from 750- 735 B.C.

Ahaz reigned for 16 years from 731-715 B.C. In 721 B.C. Assyria invaded the northern Kingdom of Israel. During the reign of Ahaz, the kingdom of Judah was untouched by the Assyrian power.

Hezekiah reigned for 29 years from 715-687 B.C. Hezekiah was encouraged to rebel against the king of Assyria and entered into an alliance with the king of Egypt. In 701 B.C. the King of Assyria (Sennacherib) brought a large army into Judea and threatened to conquer Jerusalem. Because Hezekiah humbled himself before God and pleaded for help, it was prophesied that Sennacherib would not enter the city and that, when he went home, he would be killed by his own family. The remaining years of Hezekiah's reign were peaceful. Isaiah probably lived to its close, and possibly into the reign of Manasseh. In 587 the Babylonians invaded Judah and took many into captivity for seventy years.

Now that we’ve looked at the setting, let’s look at the man himself, Isaiah. Along with Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, are frequently referred to as major prophets whereas the shorter prophetic books (Amos, Hosea, Zephaniah, etc.) are written by minor prophets. The word “minor” means lesser in importance, seriousness, or significance. This designation apparently began with Augustine. Yet, 2 Tim. 3:16-17, tells us that “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”

If all Scripture is inspired and is useful so that we may be thoroughly equipped for every good work, then should some books be designated as minor while others as major? We don’t do that with the epistles. Romans isn’t labeled a major epistle while Jude, Philemon, and those written by Peter and John are not called minor epistles. Why don’t we do away with these designations?

As with several other books of the Bible, there is a controversy as to who wrote the book of Isaiah, or at least who wrote some of it. The traditional view is that one person, Isaiah, wrote this book during the reigns of Jotham and Hezekiah. But some scholars believe that some of the prophetic portions, such as those that refer to the Persian King Cyrus in Isa. 45:1 who lived about 200 years after Isaiah. leading some to believe that this part of the book must have been written much later. These scholars find it difficult to believe that Isaiah could know the future. They have a limited view of what inspiration means. They think that the Bible is inspired only to the degree that a great piece of literature or music is inspired. So prophetic sections of Isaiah must have been written later, after the fact. What was written as prophecy by Isaiah is viewed as history written by a “second Isaiah”.

One of the strongest arguments for accepting Isaiah as the author of the entire book is the fact that Jesus and the apostles refer to him as the author of those prophetic chapters.

Matt. 12:17-18 quotes Isa. 42:1; Matt. 3:3 quotes Isa. 40:3; Luke 3:4 quotes Isa. Isa 40:3-5; Acts 8:28 refers to Isa. 53:7-8. Rom. 20:20 quotes Isa. 65:1; and John 12:38-41 quotes Isa. 53:1

The sin that led to the Babylonian captivity was idolatry. If part of this book was written after their captivity, why is idolatry mentioned throughout the book when idolatry was not practiced by those who returned from Babylon?

I think that those who don’t believe that God could provide a prophetic message to his people have a diminished view of God and divine inspiration. Micah 5:2 gives Bethlehem as the birthplace of the Messiah. Surely Micah, a contemporary of Isaiah, wasn’t written after the birth of Jesus.

Isaiah’s ministry ran from the time of Judah's King Uzziah (740 B.C.), through the reigns of Jotham and Ahaz, to the end of King Hezekiah's rule in 687 B.C. His contemporaries included Amos and Hosea, who ministered to the northern Kingdom of Israel, and Micah who ministered in Judah.

Isaiah wasn’t on the government payroll; he wasn’t in an official position such as Religious Advisor to the King. Rather, he was part of an informal circle of trusted advisors who had access to those in power. Many leaders reach out to respected experts in the private sector for guidance. These are people who have easy access to the corridors of power whose advice is given in private.

The Bible records that he was married, though his wife’s name isn’t given. We’ll just refer to her as Mrs. Isaiah. She may have been the more reserved personality who kept a low-profile taking care of their two sons.

Isaiah’s writing is referenced more than 35 times in the New Testament, and he is the most quoted Old Testament writer in the Gospel accounts. And why wouldn’t he be? Apparently, those who know ancient Hebrew say that he was very well educated, and his writings were on the par with Shakespeare. In fact, he has been referred to as the Shakespeare of the Old Testament. I wonder what Shakespeare would have thought. “Nah, he’s not anywhere near as good a writer as I am.”

Besides writing his own book, he wrote a biography of Uzziah, King of Judah. After Uzziah became powerful, his pride led him to his downfall (2 Chron. 26:16 and 22). This book has been lost to history. But if you happen to come across a copy, it might be worth a fortune. And if someone tries to sell you a copy on Amazon, beware, it is probably a hoax.

Isaiah’s writings are appreciated even to this day. Isaiah 2:4 adorns the wall across the street from the United Nations in New York, “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.” For many years this quote was posted without attribution, perhaps out of fear of offending the Communist and Muslim delegations who wouldn’t want a passage from the Hebrew Bible in so prominent a place.

When eloquent words weren’t enough to get Isaiah’s message across, he acted out his prophecies. Isaiah, at one point during his ministry, was commanded to preach “going around stripped and barefooted” to illustrate how the Israelites would be taken prisoner by the Babylonians.

With a ministry lasting over 40 years, Isaiah touched on a wide range of subjects. The first 39 chapters consist of short-term prophecies. The second part, chapters 40-55, contain medium-term prophecies concerning the end of the Babylonian exile in about 539 B.C. The third part, chapters 56-66, deals with the long term, including the second coming of the Messiah and his millennial reign.

The opening chapters focus on the fact that God’s people had forsaken him. They observed rituals while violating ethics. Its rulers were dishonest, greedy and indifferent to the needs of the poor. He writes about the coming of the Messiah, both first and second. And a time of universal peace.

Isaiah gave prophecies concerning the coming of the Messiah including being born of a virgin, of the lineage of David and even of his unremarkable appearance. It even refers to his rejection by the people, his trial as a criminal, his torture, death and burial.

There is one passage that is widely misused by prosperity preachers. It is Isa. 53:4-5 says, “He was pierced through for our transgressions. . . by His scourging we are healed.” This doesn’t mean physical healing is promised. The context, mentioning our transgressions and iniquities, tells us that the healing is spiritual, not physical. Both Paul and Timothy had medical issues. Our present bodies are said to be perishable and weak (1 Cor. 15:42-44) and are decaying (2 Cor. 4:16).

Do we have enough background to begin reading the book itself? 

Recent Articles

March 12, 2025
The Call of Isaiah
March 6, 2025
What is Lent?
March 6, 2025
The Messianic Age and The Song of the Vineyard
March 6, 2025
Who are the prophets of God in the Old Testament?
February 27, 2025
The Indictment and Judgment of Judah!
December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024 - January 2, 2025, is Hanukkah (Festival of Lights)
November 29, 2024
Sex and the Bible
November 22, 2024
Genesis Chapter 40 The Cupbearer and the Baker
November 22, 2024
The Conclusion of the Matter
October 31, 2024
The Feast of Tabernacles, October 16-23, 2024
Show More

Share this:

Start Here...

Why Study the Bible?


Don’t many consider the Bible to be just a book of myths? Why do we read the Bible rather than the sacred literature of other religions?


How do we know that it is from God? How do we know that what we have today is an accurate translation from the original? Is the Bible complete or have there been some books that have been lost?


We should be able to answer these questions, and there are answers! So start here!

Learn More

Answers to Common Bible Questions

December 17, 2021
Lent is a six week period of spiritual devotion starting on Ash Wednesday and ending at Easter. Those who observe Lent usually give up something for Lent. Some might give up coffee, or soda pop, or alcohol, or chocolate. May I suggest that you give up something that will really impress God and make this season of Lent one of the most memorable and meaningful seasons of your life?  May I suggest that if you are giving up something, why not give up some of the acts of our sinful nature mentioned in Gal. 5:19? Why don’t we give up lying about others? Do you think you can give up the hate you feel towards others? How about envy, can we work on putting envy aside this year? How about giving up on the naïve idea that all pastors are mature Christian leaders whose word should always be accepted, rather than wolfs in sheep’s clothing (Matt 7:15). How about giving up the idea that everyone in church is a real Christian (Matt 7:21-23). How about giving up your desire to seek revenge on those who have hurt you (Matt 18:21-22)? If you are insecure and feel threatened when you see the success of others in ministry, how about giving up efforts to hinder others who have been called to minister (Rom 12:4-8)? Of course it is easier to give up something like chocolate, etc. and make yourself feel like you are doing something that is pleasing to God. If you are not willing to give up unchristian behavior, might I suggest something that will really please God this Lent? Give up all evidence of your profession of Christian faith, such as books, pictures and jewelry. Don’t talk about God, Jesus or the Church. I think God would appreciate it if you would stop giving HIM a bad name by the way you live. Let’s give up what hinders our witness and become a better ambassador for Christ (2 Cor 5:20) this Lenten season.
December 17, 2021
In Matthew 2:1-2 is says that the magi saw "His star in the east." What was this star that guided these men to Jesus? Some have suggested that it could have been a comet, an asteroid, or perhaps a meteor or an especially bright star. The problem with these suggestions is that these physical things either quickly move across the sky and then disappear or are too far away to provide directions with any precision. It would be hard to get directions from such objects. The "star" had to move constantly or intermittently at the same pace as the magi. Then it says that it hovered over the house where Mary and Joseph had moved to with Jesus. It hardly sounds like a comet or meteor or a star as we know them. Can you think of another time that people in the Bible were guided by some form of light? How about the time when Moses was leading the Israelites out of Egypt? He didn't have a global positioning system with him. He did have a pillar of fire that led him at night (Ex 13:21-22). We see this light in Solomon's Temple (2 Chron 7:1-3) and when the Jews were about to go into Babylonian captivity, we see it leaving the Temple (Ezek 9-11). In the New Testament we see it at the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:9) at His transfiguration (Matt 17:5) and His ascension (Acts 1:9).  What exactly was this guiding light? The word "star" can also be translated as "radiance." It appears that it was this "radiance" that guided Moses and the magi. The Jews call this the "Shekinah", a physical manifestation of the glory of God in the form of a supernatural radiance. This, I believe, is what the Star of Bethlehem was.
December 17, 2021
Imagine that you are the pastor of a church. A young married couple is having some difficulties in their relationship and they seek counsel from you. On Monday the wife comes in to give her assessment of their marriage. What do you think she will say? She might say that she is a hardworking, caring and supportive wife and that it is her husband who is the neglectful, insensitive brute and the source of all problems in the marriage. You feel so sorry for this wife and when you see her husband in the hallway, you think to yourself, "What a jerk." On Friday the husband comes in and gives his assessment of the marriage. He tells you that he is hard working and very generous and that she is the major problem in the relationship. As the pastor, you are wondering if they both are talking about the same marriage. Each person tells you what makes them look best and their spouse the worst. Where is the truth? The truth is probably somewhere in between  Proverbs 18:17 says, "The first to present his case seems right, til another comes forward and questions him." There are conflicts in all relationships, between spouses, parents and children, employees and employers. When you hear one side of a story, don’t assume that what you hear is the complete truth. And don’t pass on to someone else what you have heard. Probably, at least some of what you heard is untrue to gain your support in a conflict.
More Posts
Share by: